Monday, March 9, 2009
Name changed to...
Because I do. It's silly, but I realized this when I saw a Nor-Cal sticker and really wanted one. I think this means my heart is now approaching an even split between Austin and Oakland... never saw that one coming. I mean, I do hella heart Austin, Texas!
Now I just need some swag.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Memo: Classroom/School Policies and Procedures, Professional Conduct
Re: Interactions with Ms. S, February 5 – 11, 2009
Date: February 19, 2009
Background/Suspension Situation:
[Student 1] had been repeatedly disrupting my 5th period class for many days in a row. She had been tracking the behavior and call-outs herself for 3 days and had a complete understanding of why she was being suspended. I met with her after class every day during the week of February 1, and by Thursday decided to suspend her from class for 1 day (Friday 2/6/2009), as is my contractual right. She was given her work on Thursday, parent was called, but phone number was disconnected. As a side note, [student 1] has behaved incredibly well since her 1-day class suspension. I take referrals and class suspensions very seriously, and my record will show that I do not frequently remove students from class, unless the situation is very severe or the behavior has not changed after multiple student conferences, and parent phone calls (or attempts).
On Thursday afternoon, I filled out the teacher suspension forms in the front office and placed them into one of the AP boxes. I am not sure which, but in hindsight, it was probably Mr. G’s. [Front office secretary] told me to just put it in either one, since no one knows who will take care of the student the next day. On the few occasions I have done this in the past, the administrators have been very casual about the process – usually just telling me to stick the form in their box without being too concerned about it.
I then proceeded to the AP office area, in order to give one of them the courtesy of knowing that I had placed that form in their box. Ms. S’s door was open, but she looked busy, so I just mentioned to her in passing that I had put the form in one of their boxes. I was not asking for a reply or a conference, it was simply a quick casual comment so she would know what was going on. Instead of just saying “OK” and returning to work, Ms. S reprimanded me. The entire interaction was about 8-10 seconds. In her memo, she indicated that I was “yelling” at her, which was absolutely not the case.
On Friday, [student 1] knew that she should go to the office and did. About 5 minutes into SSR, she returns to class with a security guard, who says that [student 1] is returning to class. I did not understand what happened in the office or why she was in my class, so I sent her back. She was returned a few minutes later, and I wrote a short referral that simply said “[student 1] is suspended from class,” and sent her back. Next, I receive a phone call from Ms. S about the form. At this point, I am unhappy that my class has been disrupted 3 times, and each time, the students are seeing my authority undermined. Many of them are giggling and SSR [sustained silent reading] is beginning to break down (whereas it is usually completely quiet with 95% of students actually reading every day). SSR is nearly over, and I now have to write the details for her suspension again – approximately one paragraph. I also wrote a note to Ms. S about the situation, re-stating that I filled it out and put in one of the boxes. Since class was starting, I had to write both very quickly – I do not have them to reference at the time of this memo.
Follow-up Conference:
On Wednesday, February 11, I was summoned into Ms. S’s office about the situation. I sat down without saying anything and waited for Ms. S to begin. She had my note in her hand, and started to aggressively lecture me about the situation, without asking me about my reasons for the note or suspension, or being willing to engage in a problem-solving approach to the situation. The first point she spoke about was the first line in my note, where I mention placing [student 1]’s “suspension form” into an AP box. She started going on about how she doesn’t know which type of suspension form I was talking about in the note – since I don’t have the power to suspend students from school. At that point, I interjected to clarify, because I didn’t understand why it was unclear to her that I was referring to a teacher-initiated suspension. I have no authority to suspend students from school, no access to the forms, and have never even seen one. I tried to clarify that my note could only have meant the teacher-initiated suspension form, and logically not any other, but was cut off.
After about 1-2 minutes of her lecturing me, I calmly asked “Ms. S, do you mind if I interrupt you?” She said OK. I don’t remember my exact words, but I requested that we conduct the meeting in a way that gave her and I a chance to talk about our feelings around the situation and to come to a consensus or new way to handling something like this in the future. She refused my request and continued to lecture me in a condescending manner.
While she lectured me, her tone was unfriendly at best. The entire time, I sat quietly and responded neutrally with the words “I understand”. After about 5 minutes, I was feeling very belittled and like the conversation was going nowhere constructive. I quietly said that I was beginning to feel anxious and angry because of how I was being spoken to and that I needed to discontinue the conversation before it became unprofessional on my part. At this point, I had said nothing else in the entire meeting other than what I have documented here.
I stood up to leave, and Ms. S followed me out, all the while continuing to berate me and saying that I “can’t tell her how to run the meeting”. I responded that I was not telling her how to do anything, only that I had once requested that we do it in a way that would be productive for both of us. At this point, my voice has remained very calm and professional. I am beginning to have tears in my eyes because of the way I was being treated. Ms. S’s voice has gotten progressively more discourteous during the entire exchange.
She then marches me over to Ms. C’s office and closed the door behind her, leaving me standing in the outer office area. After a few minutes, Ms. C called me in to meet with her alone. During this meeting, she asked me to explain my side of the story, then professionally told me another way that we could handle the class suspension in the future. I was very pleased with how Ms. C handled the conversation.
Post-Conference Reactions:
I understand that the office may have been busy that Friday. However, I am sure that I completed the forms and followed all proper disciplinary procedures before suspending the child from my class. As a matter of professional courtesy, I will acknowledge that there is a very small chance that I was the one who lost the form. However, it is equally likely that someone else did, and I would have appreciated that acknowledgement during the ordeal. We all receive a lot of paper, and it could have been anyone.
I found the exchange to be very upsetting. Two of my students and [front office secretary] saw me in the office, clearly in a state of calm distress. Ms. S’s handling of the original situation and her tone with me made me feel like an undervalued colleague. The extent to which she spoke harshly made me very anxious, and felt unfair and unprofessional. That is why I thought it best to leave the situation before I caused it to escalate.
Reactions to Ms. S’s Memo – 2/19/2009
“You are responsible for developing and implementing an effective classroom management plan.”
Most visitors to my classroom this year agree that the management and student engagement in my class is at or above par, at least in comparison to my peers at [our school]. I take referrals of my own students very seriously and do absolutely everything I can to ensure that they do not miss class unless there is no other alternative. I conference with students after class on a daily basis; in the case of [student 1] and [student 2], I have conferenced with each of them at least a dozen times this semester. Their parents are very difficult to get on the phone. I am not up-to-date with my parent and student conference log, due to the fact that I am still only a second-year teacher and have a large number of things to balance in order to be an effective instructor for all of my students. Unfortunately, paperwork tends to fall to the wayside in lieu of more pressing objectives.
“C. Counselor Referral”
I am not aware of any procedure that is regularly followed by teachers involving a counselor referral. I am happy to do so if given more information, as I truly believe that counseling is much more effective than discipline in rectifying student behavior.
I do not know how many referrals I have written this year, only that I am sure it is significantly less than last year. [student 1] and [student 2] have been much better behaved since their respective referrals. Both girls have not only behaved well, but have also been completing more work and actively participating in class. This is also critical to the success of my 5th period class – when those two girls are on task, the rest of the class is as well. The class also sees me effectively following through on behavior issues with them, which keeps all of the students on track.
P. 2, second paragraph: “whenever I have spoken to you, I have given you the courtesy of respect…you interrupted me repeatedly, were insistent on how I conduct the meeting…”
All three statements are untrue, as evidenced by the information above.
“Board Policy states that we are to refrain from “discourteous, offensive, or abusive conduct or language…”
All of my comments are detailed above, so I am stating for the record that there was nothing discourteous, offensive or abusive about my language or comportment. However, the entire manner in which Ms. S addressed me during the meeting falls into the realm of “discourteous, offensive, or abusive.” As stated above, she spoke almost constantly and brought me to the point of tears.
Related Outcomes:
As a result of this situation, I am formally requesting that Ms. S be removed as my evaluator. I understand that this may not be possible, but if it is, I would greatly appreciate the change, as I am unsure that she can provide an objective evaluation.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Texas Top 10% Law
Google!
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Ding Ding!
Friday, January 23, 2009
2009-2010
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Coming Soon...
- Schools of education must focus their teachers on student achievement above all else. The schools of education should be judged on the achievement of the students in their graduate's classrooms. Teachers must be taught how to break down standards into daily objectives that can be assessed and tracked constantly, to inform instructional choices. Teachers must be given the tools to teach students coming from low-income communities.
- College students of all majors should be encouraged to puruse teacher certification concurrently with their regular major. Teaching should be promoted (not exclusively) as a entry-level career option, pursued by many for 3-5+ years. Comprehensive loan forgiveness programs should be in place for teachers and other public service jobs.
- Veteran teachers must be compensated well and given additional (optional) responsibilities, including mentoring, in exchange for lighter class loads. Hybrid teacher-administrator jobs should be created to allow for upward career movement.
- The current school system is a congolmerate of 15,000 school districts. The overhead and administrative cost for 15,000 districts is enormous. Cut the administration by nationalizing and creating 70 or so sub-regions - one per state (2 for large states), plus one for the 20 largest metropolitan areas.
- National Standards for all grade levels in the core areas of reading, writing, math, and science. National standards must be implemented along with national exams that comprehensively and rigorously test the standards - ideally, including free-response questions like AP exams.
- All student records should be nationalized and tracked electronically. Student test scores and growth should be tracked by standard, with teachers held accountable for the academic value added to their students. Students should be assigned an ID number (in no way linked to immigration status) that would follow them throughout the American education system, no matter where they move. Cumulative file information will be electronic rather than paper.